My dear lemmings,

I discovered Clonezilla a while ago and it still is my main tool to backup and restore the partitions I care about on my computers.

I cannot help but wonder if there are now better, more efficient alternatives or is it still a solid choice? There’s nothing wrong with it, I’m just curious about others’ practices and habits — and if there was newer tools or solutions available.

Thank you for your feedback, and keep your drives safe!

  • PenguinCoder@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Clonezilla has its place, but not as a main backup and restoration tool. I personally don’t see it as a backup tool, especially that it operates at partition level for such. What you want is you base install system and file level backups for your data (/home/) etc. For the file level backups, use something like restic. Backup what you need to go from a fresh install to a system with your data back on it. Packages can be reinstalled.

    Restic is my primary backup for all my devices. If I need something more than fresh iso -> my data system, I use packer.

    • yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I noticed for file level backups you mentioned something other than rsync. Any particular reason why you landed on restic instead?

      • PenguinCoder@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because that serve different purposes. rsync is for moving data around, synchronization of such. It has no concept of point in time restoration, or snapshots (etc) that really define a backup solution. I use restic because its the proper tool for the job.

        • yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          point in time restoration, or snapshots

          Do you mean like not just having another copy of a file, but being able to restore a specific version of a file?

          • PenguinCoder@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            There’s a lot more going on with restic aside from just that, but yes. So with an rsync of your home dir (for example), it’s reliant on the FS to do compression and deduplication (ZFS,btrs), and/or it will still take up a lot of wasted space. Say you got ransom-wared. It’s okay you have that rsync backup, but oh crap it got ransom-wared to. No more backups to try? Restic gives you snapshots for whatever increment you set and just handles it simply. You can then restore one file from any of the snaphots (history) or every single file. Restoreing 250kb vs 400TB is quite a difference. The benefits of this, are huge even beyond the fire and forget capability.

            I mean, rsync handling everything via mirroring and pushed to a ZFS FS, would be sort of the same thing.