azdle@news.idlestate.org to Rust@programming.devEnglish · 5 months agothings rust shipped without (2015)graydon2.dreamwidth.orgexternal-linkmessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up133arrow-down12
arrow-up131arrow-down1external-linkthings rust shipped without (2015)graydon2.dreamwidth.orgazdle@news.idlestate.org to Rust@programming.devEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square23linkfedilink
minus-squareNostraDavid@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·5 months agoI really should learn some Rust 😂
minus-squaremonogram@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-27 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareTehPers@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 months agoOr both? Functional languages are good to be familiar with, but so is Rust’s strict ownership model. Both lead to better code in all languages.
minus-squarevas@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 months agoIt’s not only the efficiency boost. What about safe concurrency? Or about the tooling - does sbt really compare favorably to cargo? (I’d say “no”, having used both over multiple years)
I really should learn some Rust 😂
deleted by creator
Or both? Functional languages are good to be familiar with, but so is Rust’s strict ownership model. Both lead to better code in all languages.
It’s not only the efficiency boost. What about safe concurrency? Or about the tooling - does sbt really compare favorably to cargo? (I’d say “no”, having used both over multiple years)
deleted by creator