• InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Imagine both the annoyance and job security having to manage MS-DOS and 3.1 systems for a railroad would entail.

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Frankly that’s nothing. In the worst case a train won’t start, which for DB really isn’t something unusual. It’s far more disturbing how the whole global financial market sometimes rely on code that’s still written in COBOL.

      • maness300@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        rely on code that’s still written in COBOL.

        Does this really matter? It’s more of a maintenance issue than a functional one.

        It all gets compiled down to binary, anyways.

        • kiagam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          it matters because it is a language that few people learn, so the available talent is scarce, increasing the chance something bad happens. Keeping up with an evolving society is essential for the longevity of a service

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            the available talent is scarce

            I have a friend who is going to take over maintenance for a smaller regional banking system in a few years. It’s mostly COBOL and the systems themselves have not been updated in like 25-30 years. He has been apprenticing under his mother who has been in charge of maintaining the infrastructure there since the late '80s.