• PlantObserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hey Proton how about you quit privacy-washing and actually prioritize and release feature parity products for Linux so your customers aren’t being herded onto windows’ data harvesting platform just so they can use your supposedly privacy forward products

      • 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, can’t you just package your app in flatpack or even snap? Bam, your app works on 99% of distributions for little effort. That’s what Spotify does, and I’d argue they have even less incentive to support Linux than proton does

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Sure, as long as you don’t need any integration with other software, don’t need arbitrary IPC, and actually keep some dependencies in line with some common denominator because there’s only so much you can do with static linking (oh excuse me, distributing the shared libraries in the same package as your binaries as if it’s a new thing) once it reach the “program must actually run” part.

          Flatpack and every other similar solution that are described as “works everywhere” always come with a heck of limitations.

        • セリャスト@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          He also answered this claim, it is right for apps that aren’t stuff like Proton VPN that can’t work in a sandboxed environment. They are working on it iirc