• VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The potential of a “exclusion argument” does not justify reinforcing the servile, assistant stereotype. Researchers arent pulling that one out of their ass.

    I could pull together a youtube playlist of beardy men explaining why woman hating is bad. Would you like that?

    (Edit: Rhetorical. We can all see your true colors with the “gay agenda” conspiracy pushing bs.)

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The potential of a “exclusion argument” does not justify reinforcing the servile, assistant stereotype.

      My point is that no matter what openai did, the author could have found sexism in it. It’s not hard to create something like this if you’re really trying.

      I could pull together a youtube playlist of beardy men explaining why woman hating is bad. Would you like that?

      I don’t follow.

      (Edit: Rhetorical. We can all see your true colors with the “gay agenda” conspiracy pushing bs.)

      Lol. I’ve been an lbgtq ally probably even before you were born. The fact that I can see that this ridiculously biased source for what it is doesn’t make me a conspiracy theorist against gay people.

      Thanks for demonstrating my point. You were desperate to reveal my “try colors” and, by golly, you were going to find it regardless of how much you had to spin.