No, it was just suddenly completely irrelevant. The answers of the first chat bot that supposedly “beat” it are a complete joke. And yes, I just wrote exactly the same with the goal getting moved, next it has to invent relativity or it’s not intelligent. Absurd.
So every human that does not come up with something entirely new that has never been before is not intelligent? Are people with an IQ of 80 not intelligent anymore, just bio-machines?Seriously, where do you draw the line? You keep shifting the goal to harder and harder to reach things that at this point most people would not fit anymore. When GPT5 will then also do that, what will you say? That it did not invent the car? Come up with relativistic effects?
What of what you say does not apply to humans? They apply patterns of behavior in response to some input. Picked up by learning them. Including people talking online. They are always biased on some way. Some will acknowledge their bias and change it if you give them context.
GPT can literally create simulations. I have used it to do exactly that, specifically for 2D heat conducting with coupled mass transport and reaction kinetics.
If GPT4o is still not what you would call AI, then what is? You can have conversations with it, the Turing test is completely irrelevant all of the sudden.
Because people do not care. It is that simple.
The most time saving for a single task that I had so far was when repairing a Ebike battery that needed a new BMS. Finding the cause and fixing it was only possible because GPT swallowed the relevant sections of the datasheet and spit out code to read/write to the chip. That would have taken dozens of hours for me to understand what does what and under which condition and then make code out of it too. I put it on GitHub so others do not need to suffer.
Nothing else? Please do not speak for other people if you can not grasp what others do with this tool.
The people apologizing for this sort of behavior, even here, just shows how easy it is to manipulate people.
Most lithium batteries are real, however, and not a stupid lab thing that only performs in one category and no other, while an are needed in the real world.
80 % in 9 minutes is only 5 C, not really something that amazing.
What exactly do you want to do and how?
And where do you switch it?
How does it compare to Newpipe?
Who said that they only improve the most modern plants? And why not by using the heat too? And only those burning NG? Why not nuclear, solar, wind etc.? As stupid as such a random made up number is, it is possible, given how vague it is.
Why should a 15 % improvement break that?
And these things produce actually perpendicular lines?
You can’t see them through the view finder, but they are in the picture.
You aim it at what? Who has that?
Older phones get updates?
Odd that GPT (and of course all the LLMs too) only got better so far…