The world runs on contacts, and those dollars were spent around the globe. There are examples of what you say, with mali considering reclaiming ml. Nationalization can have a chilling effect on industry, but depending on your affiliations this isn’t really an issue

A fair point indeed, but that’s not how it is. Public dollars were funneled one-way into private infra, in many cases.

“it seems so backwards”

They set the shit up, so they decided the behaviors.

Because they prop up the infra to support them right?

Funny thing here on Lemmy…

It’s the country named in the article lmao

I see like 20 lines of code and an image. Is there more?

I want to live in the aug reality future where professionals like surgeons dand uncompromising standards with zero absolute zero bullshit like ads or intrusions

That’s… Not how llms work. Ai generating a picture from a prompt is the exact same mechanics as an interactive chat. They are fundamentallly the same thing . The image and the text ai response are both created via a prompt, and many image ai tools already have an ongoing multi part prompt history just like a chat. (Additive prompt)

It’s just a difference of degrees: the chat just consumes more frequent prompts and generates different, “quicker” outputs.

Well I guess we disagree. Blaming content for human actions is ignoring the real problem, imo. It shoves off responsibility to the “artist”

That’s just a matter of degrees. There could be a song or a book that is so impactful, it changes your whole life.

Further, it feels like a Pandora’s box issue. If media is responsible for the actions of the user, then it won’t stop with ai bots.

Where?

But at the end of the day it’s “art” (shitty, copyright infringing, yes.), Or at minimum “media”. When has other media been “grossly negligent” or generally responsible for the acts of the consumers? Aggressive/emotional books or music certainly has joined folks at the moment of their self inflicted demise. Violent video games have certainly been “on the shelf” for some who commit horrible violence. We don’t blame those media for causing what the users do…

Edit to be clear I’m not suggesting mentally unstable folks can’t be seriously impacted by the content they consume. Or that that isn’t a serious issue.

But if a chatbot is held liable for the actions of a user, why wouldn’t a song about ending your life be held to the same standard? I would hope it’s not.

Shocked is how you should respond if you see a man cut off his own foot and eat it.

Shocked is the wrong word for when someone watches television.

Token API key go brrrrrr?

Nope, just aware how the real world works.

When this happens my response is to go find another job

No where in my comment did I say I felt it was a good thing, or acceptable. It’s just common. You assumed I am cool with it cause it fits your worldview

Edit Tell me: you think you’re just going to say “no, I’m not gonna take on new or increased tasks” , and come out successfully at the end of the year? (In review, raise, or continued employment?)

The only move is to leave or do the work

I work with several European tech teams and when staffing issues happen the other devs absolutely have to carry the slack.

Unfortunately that’s not how it works.

Boss turns around and says “new responsibilies. Get after them.” You’re especially fucked if the work is the type of tasks you are already responsible for.

Sure, you can say no, or slow play it, but that just means you’ll either get a shitty review or get fired.

I’m not justifying this, I’m recounting what often happens.

Downvotes are hilarious. Doesn’t matter if you line it, it’s how it happens around the world.

Addendum: batman crosses the Rubicon. ( Subtitle: you asked for this)

I will say the next attempt was interesting, but even less of a good try.