• 1 Post
  • 53 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 18th, 2024

help-circle

  • Your case sounds like a perfect fit for Bazzite or Aurora.

    • Both come already set up ootb, with all quality of life tweaks you want and need.
    • They are image based distros (“immutable”), so you mainly work in your /var/ and /home/ directory, and all the other stuff is untouched and clean.
    • They are very modern, getting the same updates at the same time as upstream Fedora.
    • Running Ollama is just one ujust command away, many complex things are made easier with those commands
    • You probably won’t get a lot more performance I believe. At least when I switched from regular Fedora/ Silverblue to Bazzite, I didn’t notice many more FPS in games for example.


  • For the beginning, I would recommend you to stick to a more popular Distro, like Mint, Fedora, Debian, and therelike.

    Many niche distros, like CachyOS, are more tailored towards advanced users who know what they’re up to, or for special use cases, like TailsOS for extreme privacy (e.g. buying drugs, journalism, etc., it’s also commonly installed on an USB stick for portability and non-persistency).

    With Fedora or Mint you get way more community support and resources in case something doesn’t work as expected for you.

    They’re also (mostly) identical performance wise.

    For gaming, I would recommend you Bazzite, which gives you a first class gaming experience, and is extremely robust due to it being a completely new kind of distro. It also has the Nvidia-drivers already baked in if chosen, which makes it more reliable.

    But regular Fedora (especially the KDE spin) or other common distros are perfectly fine too for that.


  • I’ve had this happen more often than I’d like to admit.

    There were quite a few instances where I just couldn’t game in the evening after turning on my PC, mostly because of my power supply (outages while updating, unstable grid, damaged PSU and hard drive, etc.) and my ability to shoot myself in the foot in regards to my IT skills.

    I imagined spending my friday evening differently than chrooting my install from another USB more often than I’d like to admit. At least Linux is repairable, good luck trying that with Windows…

    Now, thankfully, I live in another house with a landlord that actually cares that I don’t get electrocuted in my shower, and I don’t have those problems anymore. I also don’t tinker as much with my OS anymore, at least not much.

    Still, Fedora Atomic feels way more robust and less buggy than regular Fedora, especially KDE. And the QoL tweaks from uBlue are great too!


  • Fliegenpilzgünni@slrpnk.nettoLinux@lemmy.mlIs there a programming specific distro?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Probably Bluefin-DX.

    The “DX” stands for developer experience. It’s a variant of uBlue/ Fedora Atomic (Silverblue) with a lot of added programming tools like Brew, Nix, IDEs, local LLMs, and more.

    You can read more about it on the website.

    There’s also Aurora, which is the same, but with KDE instead of Gnome.

    The dx-images are meant to be a plug-and-play solution for developers. You just install it, share your container config to your project colleagues, and go. Don’t worry about not being able to work because of a bad update or some misalignments in your package manager broke your OS. Most stuff is containerised, and if your host breaks, you can just roll back, because the system is basically powered by git.

    I’m no developer, but I use the regular variant for casual purposes (no specific tasks, mostly browser) on my laptop, and Bazzite (also very similar, but gaming focused) on my desktop, and both are wonderful! They’re the most boring distro/ OS I’ve used yet, and that’s great. They’re immutable/ image based and always work reliably.

    I can really recommend them for a lot of people, from ranging from IT professionals to my mum.


  • I totally understand your wish, absolutely valid. From what I know Mint supports secure boot.

    There aren’t many things that prevent that, but one might be the Nvidia driver. Were you able to boot into Mint and install it or similar things? Or did you just get greeted by the error message?

    Maybe try downloading the image again and reflash it with another tool (e.g. Fedora Media Writer instead of Etcher) on another USB if you have one. It might be totally possible that your .iso did get corrupted in the process. And then do the whole process again.

    I believe I had something similar a long time ago when I aborted the download and then resumed it, or when I pulled the USB too quickly without safely ejecting it beforehand.

    I don’t use Mint, but secure boot is something that usually works by default on most distros.


  • Afaik, secure boot won’t increase the security as much as you think.

    Did you try to reinstall it? From what you’ve written, you have some trouble with booting it. Maybe you selected some wrong partition schemes? The best one would be to select “Wipe whole drive and install”.

    Did you disable secure boot, install it, and the enable it again? If yes, don’t. Boot your ISO from the USB with secure boot enabled and install it from there.

    Btw, if you worry about security, then also consider also enabling full disk encryption, or at least the encryption of /home/


  • I wanted to add my own comment first, but yours covers it very well.

    OP will be very happy with KDE and its’ app ecosystem.

    About distro choice, it doesn’t matter very much.

    My top recommendation would be Fedora Atomic KDE (Bazzite or Aurora), because it “just works”, has zero maintenence, will never break, and especially on Bazzite, gives you a first class gaming experience.

    Other than Bazzite/ Aurora, I can of course recommend classic Fedora KDE, because of the sane defaults and both modern and stable release schedule.

    OpenSuse Tumbleweed would be great if OP wants something that’s both bleeding edge and reliable, and EndeavourOS if they like Arch with very sane defaults, but more minimal than Tumbleweed.


  • I also made a very similar comment, but with uBlue (Bazzite, Aurora, Bluefin) instead.

    They are still pretty vanilla, but include a big list of QoL stuff added in, like staged updates, Distrobox, a huge list gaming tweaks in Bazzite, and much more.

    It’s basically stock Atomic made right!

    I’ve used them for a year now, and they’re fantastic!

    Just a small heads up for OP: You have to do quite a lot of (advanced) things differently from now on if you choose Atomic. Use containers (Distrobox, etc.) for everything you can, avoid installing stuff on the host if possible, etc.


  • Fliegenpilzgünni@slrpnk.nettoLinux@lemmy.mlWhich distro?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Because others already suggested Arch/ EndeavourOS, I’ll be suggesting something else: Bazzite.

    It’s part of the image based (“immutable”) Fedora series and is basically Fedora Kinoite, with all drivers and codecs already set up for you, self managing, with many gaming tweaks included.

    It’s rock solid and basically unbreakable, while also being extremely modern and updated. On Arch, even if it doesn’t break, you always get the newest stuff, which might not be as polished. On Fedora, it matures a few months, while still being very modern.

    The main target group is “For Linux users who don’t want to use Linux”, meaning, it runs all your favourite stuff (KDE, etc.) without having to care for anything. It even updates itself automatically in the background without any interference.

    If you prefer something with less “bloat” (a lot of optional tools and software to choose from, but nothing mandatory), then check out Aurora, which is basically the same, but without gaming stuff.

    For more information, check out universal-blue.org

    Just a small heads up for OP: You have to do quite a lot of (advanced) things differently from now on if you choose Atomic.

    Use containers (Distrobox, etc.) for everything you can, avoid installing stuff on the host if possible, etc.

    Just use Flatpaks for 95% you do graphically, and for CLI stuff or software that isn’t available as Flatpak, I would recommend you to create an Arch Distrobox container (already set up IIRC) and use that. You can even install stuff from the AUR and export it, so it works just like it is supposed to.


  • Maybe, another consideration might be to not run Linux on Windows in some way, but the other way around.

    Linux offers great virtualization, maybe you can use QEMU with KVM and GPU passthrough, and then run Windows inside this box.

    I find Linux more powerful and less annoying to use day to day, and having those annoyances inside a small virtualized container I can just shut down is more peaceful.


    WSL can be restricting, since Linux can’t access anything, and I think getting “the real and proper thing” might be better.

    And dual booting, by having both Windows and Linux on the same drive, is something I would advise against. Windows doesn’t play nice with others and often “accidentally” breaks the bootloader and hard drive permissions, leading only to trouble. If you dual boot, install them on a separate drive and select the booting drive manually in the BIOS.


    Also, why do you want to run Ubuntu specifically? Did you also look up for alternatives, like Fedora or Debian?



  • Fliegenpilzgünni@slrpnk.nettoLinux@lemmy.mlWhat happened to elementary OS?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Then how do you explain the continued success of Mint?

    Because Mint’s philosophy is to make a friendly, simple and usable system for everyone.

    That may be for people who came from Windows before, or those who like their OS to be a bit more conservative, meaning no flashy stuff, boring, and just working. Just like Windows was “in the good ol’ days”.

    This makes it accessible and usable by everyone, including Linux sysadmins who come home after work and don’t want to deal with annoying computers and fixing things.

    Everything on Mint feels high quality, functional and cohesive.

    ElementaryOS on the other hand feels like a cheap MacOS clone, but nothing works. Those who want Mac, buy a Mac.

    Mint/ Cinnamon on the other hand is similar to Windows (XP, 7, etc.), but not a copycat. It’s familiar enough to be intuitive for Windows users, but much enough it’s own thing.

    Mint’s main focus is to get a uncomplicated, and usable system, while Elementary’s focus is to just do what Apple does. … Well, did. 15 years ago. They totally forgot how much work maintaining a distro and a desktop with a whole app suite is, and just stopped working on it.

    While Gnome and KDE (and other WMs/ DEs) got magnitudes better in just one year (e.g. Plasma 6), Pantheon (and Elementary) just stagnated the last 5 years or so.

    They don’t even offer/ work on Wayland yet, or other new things.

    Either they’ll stop working on Elementary, and focus only on Pantheon, so it can live on on other distros, or it will just continue dying like it does currently.




  • Fliegenpilzgünni@slrpnk.nettoLinux@lemmy.mlBeginners Guides
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I never had an IT background and also “just tried” Linux a few years ago.
    Now, I’m still not an Linux expert, but relatively proficient with it.

    I tried reading “How Linux works” (free e-book), but didn’t have a great time with it.

    It’s just too detailed for someone who just wants to use Linux. It might be an absolutely great resource if you plan to work in IT, but other than that, just it’s too much wasted time.


    What helped me a lot was to use Linux as an OS for my homeserver.

    You don’t need anything fancy for it. Just use an old spare laptop or something similar you have laying around, or buy an used small form factor PC, like those Mini-PCs many businesses use. Those often cost less than 50 bucks and would otherwise land on the trash.

    Then, install your server OS of choice. The most popular one is just plain ol’ Debian, and it’s what I used. It’s a great choice!

    Servers run without a display or GUI (DE/ WM). You set it up once, and then connect to it remotely via SSH.
    With that, you can either install a web interface like CasaOS or Cockpit, or just use the CLI for everything.

    For the start, you can choose just Nextcloud AIO and call it a day. It comes with all things needed for a functioning webserver. But, things said, the learning experience ends here pretty quickly. It’s made to be easy and painless.

    If you want to learn more, then consider setting up the stuff for yourself. It’s also really not hard (coming from someone who doesn’t IT stuff professionally!), but takes a bit more time, because you have a lot of choices.

    For that, you might consider checking out c/Selfhosted and awesome-selfhosted on GitHub.
    Theres a lot of really cool things you can discover!

    The main reason I recommend that, and not just “Try LFS, Arch, Void, Gentoo, or whatever” is because I find it pretty much useless. Sure, you learn how it works, but for what price?
    When you set up your own homelab, then you have actual useful things running, you also learn a lot, and maybe you can add it to your CV when applying for jobs. I for example work in the chemistry sector, where IT stuff like this is pretty useless on the first glance, but I often got invited for a job interview exactly because of that. It’s just a nice skill to have!


    For checking out great CLI tools, check out the according video from TheLinuxExperiment or other YouTube/ PeerTube videos.

    Try to learn the basic commands, like cd, ls or cat, then look up for more advanced/ alternative tools, like tree (instead of ls), bat (instead of cat), and so on, and then try to learn shell scripting.

    I really like using fish instead of bash, because it’s a very friendly and interactive shell ;)


    I hope that my comment was helpful! :)



  • Then you can always rollback in case you don’t have a working image.

    I had to do that once. On a non-atomic install, this would have meant a completely broken system. In my case, this was one reboot away and it worked again.

    And in case you don’t like the direction of your image project going, you can also always rebase to another one in less than 5 minutes, download time and reboot included.

    uBlue for example starts with a very basic Fedora Silverblue image, which you can fork easily yourself. I have zero experience in coding or other stuff, and even I managed to get my own custom image working.

    There are already a couple of people around who started with Aurora, Secureblue or Bazzite, but then found them too opinionated, and went back to Vanilla Kinoite for example.
    It’s extremely simple to switch out the base OS to something almost completely different.

    And, you don’t loose any customisability. You can still do everything you want, take a look at Bazzite or Secureblue. Completely different kernel, additional modifications and packages, and much much more. Feels completely different than Vanilla Kinoite for example.


  • Image based distros are only complicated if you come from traditional distros, because they’re different.

    If you come from Windows or another OS, then having “The whole OS is one thing” instead of “A huge collection of packages and directories” makes everything simpler to understand, because you don’t mess with anything except /home/. You don’t have to care about anything else.

    And if you want to do something more fancy, like using a CLI tool, then having to enter a Distrobox container isn’t complicated.

    For casual use, like gaming, browsing or image editing, everything is just as usual. Nobody, except us Linux nerds, actually cares about the underlying system. Casual users just want the OS to be a tool for their programs they use, and for that, it’s ideal, because it just works and doesn’t bork itself.