Wish granted, you now have television influencer Fucker Fuckersen
Theres only one response to insurance claim denials, it’s that we should all [Redacted By lemmy.world Admins]
Join lemmy.dbzer0.com; Sail the High Seas!
Wish granted, you now have television influencer Fucker Fuckersen
Security against foreign hackers, of course
(But with the additional purpose of securing the #LandOfTheFree against those pesky #Terrorists, of course. Who’s a terrorist? Why of couse that’s anyone who dares to criticize the government ahem I mean… make threats against the United States of America 🇺🇸🦅)
I don’t think left wing people are hating on Jewish people, except maybe those crazy “Marxist-Leninist” types. Not all Jewish people are pro-Natanyahu, in fact, many are probably against Netanyahu.
right wing: “JEWS ARE EVIL”
Also, right wing: “Jews in Israel are fighting a rightious war against evil Gazans”
🤨
Reddit is mostly text, with a few images for memes, very low in storage, processing power, or bandwidth, its easy to have a fediverse replacement.
Youtube is a video platform. Video take a lot of storage, encoding/decoding, bandwidth…
And video platforms are small amount of content creators, with 99 percent of the users being non-content-creating viewers. Once the content creators are on a monopoly platform (like youtube), there’s no incentive for them to leave. And fediverse wouldn’t have the same money to make.
In contrast, anyone can find interesting links to post to a Reddit-alternative, anyone can make memes.
TLDR: Reddit is community-focused. Youtube is creator-focused. Difference in hardware requirements. Theres no practical alternative for Youtube, especially not a fediverse one.
If they weren’t a monopoly, I’d agree, they can do whatever they want.
But since they are a monopoly, its a de facto the equivalent of a town square, and they are policing people’s speech, and broadcasting annoying public announcements that nobody wants to hear.
With the FBI being gone, the republican controlled Congress now passes a law to grant law enforcement powers to the Pinkerton National Detective Agency.
🙃
Today we will learn how to make a pie:
Gather ingredients:
Cooking Process:
New Clipper Chip mandatory in new phones for “security” 😉
So a cop can remotely disable your plate, then finr you for not having a plate.
Easy revenue!
Then laws don’t apply and you get kidnapped and put into Squid Game.
/jk lolol but like as far as I know, there’s no national laws that cover airspace over internatinal waters, and international laws generally prohibit countries from controlling air space over internstional waters, so it’d just be a civil dispute between 2 civillians and the person who has their property damaged probably have to sue in the assailant’s home country to have any chance of getting a payout.
The particular reason is “government loves doing government things” 🤷♂️
If people had wings, I’m sure the FAA would regulate human flight too.
Same thing, you’re destroying an aircraft in flight, a felony.
You could just get your own cheap drone and “Oopsie” accidentally hit them. Then you could pull an uno reverse and claim they hit your first. FAA would not touch this and its a “civil matter”
USA, sorry my American-centrism was kicking in, my bad 😉
You cant legally (edit: in the USA, at least) shoot at drones even if they are tresspassing.
Well, technically they wouldn’t even be tresspassing since FAA owns all airspace, they’d be inside FAA airspace.
Shooting down a drone is treated the same as shooting down a manned aircraft, a felony. (not that they would actually enforce it, but its technically on the books)
Signal jammers are also illegal (again, not that someone would enforce it, but its on the books)
What would likely happens is:
If a rich person shoot down a non-rich person’s drone, the drone operator gets punished for “reckless drone flight” slap a huge fine if first offence, potentially jail time for future offences. The illegal act of shooting down a drone would not be enforced.
If a rich person flew a drone to harass a non-rich person, and the non-rich person shoots it down, boom, felony conviction for the person shooting down the drone, zero punishment for the drone operator.
This is how drone issues would be resolved
Or just… buy a camera?
Cameras have no radios, as far as I know. (Just watch, they are gonna start making “Smart Cameras” with phoning home to a NSA server)
If they are actually doing this, it wouldn’t be with IR lights, it’d be a radio signal. And they would also make the “airplane mode” be not really turn off the radio, but it would still be listening for signals passively, but emitting no signals (so you can’t detect that fact its listening passively). Then cops can turn on a radio broadcast to nearby phones with a “Disable Camera and Microphone functions” message. Any phone that pick it up will disable those functions.
deleted by creator
Let me guess, discussing the implementation of this? But this time instead of concerts, its at peaceful protests…
(Its an apple patent that allows iPhone cameras to be remotely disabled upon detection of a signal)
Using VPN would mean that IPs would not longer be from Russian IPs, therefore, Russian IPs accessing Youtube would drop.