Keep on telling yourself that, but most of us aren’t on physical console anyways

Issue isnt so much the 12 arch users that actually know what they are doing, but all the fucking posers

I was referring to how it affected website development, not UX.

From my understanding of the article the author has noting against js, just how it affects the development process and architecture choices.

Nah. im right on target, but thanks for the great insights

Yepp - it was, but that day was 11. June

That’s not a zero-day… Really dislike media that waters down or misuse terminology

No - I never coded complete websites in flash. But if I did my «upload of the whole container» would have been my deployment

Flash never got in the way the same like js. My main take from the whole piece is how it has changed the way websites are developed, to match that of traditional software development. Like the need to deploy to change some text in the footer of our website

I think he wants to do server side, not client. And that the dns filter picks up those ip addresses or ranges, and let some through.

Or uses a device that rotates mac

Nice. You you restore often?

How often do you do this?

Do the laws say you need to store this after verification? I mean a one time verification on account creation would work?

That depends on what your error is. It’s not a magic process, it just tries to help you with formatting. The validate is the magic, it helps you spot errors as you make them.

How would this affect the big players? Like MS -you buy from the European branch and they use buy from US. So hitting them with tariffs would hurt MS more than their customers?

I understand they will raise prices, but its not like with physical goods where the same item is resold. They use other ways to transfer money because tax

Thanks. My setup is way over complicated with 3 hosts in a cluster and shared storage, so local storage on the hosts stay unused. But i have been thinking about redoing it with separate hosts. This solution looks promising for sharing data, even if just on one host

So lxc containers and not vm’s

Could you explain further with a bit more detail? I havnt looked at this in a while but back then the options where virtiofs or nfs

If you want to share storage you need some way of doing that. Zfs is a good option for storage on vm-host level, but ist not designed for shared usage. Im not sure what you are after, but maybe you want zfs storage inside the vm for snapshots, dedup etc? Or maybe you want to share your media storage between vm’s? The first case you can use zfs inside your vm, it does not know or care about how its disks are stored or of they are a physical drive. For the second use-case you want some way to share drives, like smb, nfs etc. or a distributed filesystem if you really want to over complicate things. Truenas might be over overkill for sharing a few volumes, but you need something. I believe you can share zfs over nfs now but i have never used that outside of proxmox cluster storage

I use both debian on a vm with samba+nfs and a bare metal truenas for my needs. Find your needs and figure out what solves them

So you mount the pool to each vm that needs the shared data? Afaik zfs is not made for concurrency