It’s mostly that Librewolf is a bit like incognito mode by default and it may be confusing for new users.
If you really want to go power mode you can create multiple profiles with different cookie policies. Great to organise yourself and keep cookies where they belong
Either you go the firefox account way (librewolf has it turned off by default but you can turn it back up)
Or you go the manual way. Go to your about:profiles, open both directory for your profile data, and the folders in the corresponding librewolf folder (that you can check by going in about:profiles on librewolf).
Here’s two tips:
This is the essential thing to learn for librewolf. The settings are quite aggressive so you may need to disable the protection. And for websites you want to stay logged in, it’s opt-in.
At least they are using the internet archive, which is neat
Oh no. This is so bad. Who in their right mind would assume that a login user remains the same user throughout the session!?
Oh wait. Windows.
Why are they even in war against porn?
/j lust is just the second layer, try doing something about worse stuff like greed or gluttony
Would be cool to be AI horde compatible and just ditch the GPU requirements entirely.
I don’t think everyone got a GPU that could run stable diffusion easily, even more for laptops
No one diss the gaming demon summoning circle! Sacrifice him!
But at least Firefox is just compatibility, and not phasing out v2
ROG spending all the points in style again
… And it’s working
I don’t know what’s the brand neW meta pick, but at least BTRFS over Ext4. BTRFS is just more stable and less corruptable than Ext4. Heck, fedora changed to it as default
I rather stay on java linux
Oh, TIL
Edit: *YourWeb
True. You can’t always be 100% sure. But a quick check for download counts/version count can help. And while searching for it in the repo, you can see other similarly named packages and prevent getting hit by a typo squatter.
Despite, it’s not just for security. What if the package you’re installing has a big banner in the readme that says “Deprecated and full of security issues”? It’s not a bad package per say, but still something you need to know
*bad Devs
Always look on the official repository. Not just to see if it exists, but also to make sure it isn’t a fake/malicious one
Either flatpak or NixOs for me.
Flatpak is just light and doesn’t flood the user with 720710 lines just to say “installing Firefox”
NixOs just straight up has nothing to show.
How does it fare on BTRFS? Does it go into mounted subvolumes?
That’s a win, but it would need to be enforced… Which is harder to do
Hail the Omnissiah! I mean what-
I wanted to check out bitwarden as a self hosted service, but looks like I better stick with good ol’ keepass+Syncthing