Proton Photos as a simple archive sure. Drive can already do that.
But they won’t be able to do any of the fancy AI driven features, as they would all require Proton to have direct access to the images. That goes against the whole idea of Proton.
Same problem with AI document features.
Are those similar in some way? I don’t see the connection.
Even if your “Stupid is as stupid does” argument is true. Do you think it’d be common enough to be a problem? How common?
You think someone would give up on a real relationship just to a some money back?
Would you? How much money would be worth giving up on “The One”?
There are a number of local AI LLMs that run on any modern CPU. No GPU needed at all, let alone RTX.
Yes, exactly.
The only fix I came up with, is to charge people some amount up front, then if they’re still active weekly users in 6 months, they get a refund. That would create a better incentive structure for the app.
I expect this is temporary as the market adjusts to the new prices. Eventually drivers will leave since its not worth it to them, increasing the orders per driver. And some amount of people ordering will come back once the sticker shock passes. It’ll work out.
WarGames told us this is 1983.
The trick is to have the AIs play against themselves a whole bunch of times, to learn that the only way to win is not to play.
deleted by creator
The front page there is literally: “Give us your email, so we can find leaks of your email.” It’s exactly the same thing.
I can also see the irony. But I can’t imagine another way to do it at any scale. Do you know of another option?
I do this already. It’s great. Kagi has a browser plugin that does it.
I can’t imagine it wouldn’t. The USB-PD spec can cover a verity of voltage and amperage combinations covering practically any digital electronic device up to 100W.
The only reason it’s not used everywhere, is that it does add complexity to extremely simple and inexpensive devices. This thing is not simple or inexpensive, and it doesn’t draw more than 100W.
That’s just saying you can claim copyright if you lie about authorship. The problem then is, you may step into the realm of fraud.
That’s already been ruled on once.
A recent lawsuit challenged the human-authorship requirement in the context of works purportedly “authored” by AI. In June 2022, Stephen Thaler sued the Copyright Office for denying his application to register a visual artwork that he claims was authored “autonomously” by an AI program called the Creativity Machine. Dr. Thaler argued that human authorship is not required by the Copyright Act. On August 18, 2023, a federal district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Copyright Office. The court held that “human authorship is an essential part of a valid copyright claim,” reasoning that only human authors need copyright as an incentive to create works. Dr. Thaler has stated that he plans to appeal the decision.
Why would companies care about copyright of the output? The value is in the tool to create it. The whole issue to me revolves around the AI company profiting on it’s service. A service built on a massive library of copyrighted works. It seems clear to me, a large portion of their revenue should go equally to the owners of the works in their database.
That doesn’t sound very “Open”.