talk about not learning your lesson.

shouldn’t market them as fully developed humanoid assistants, then.

“If you’re after a small and affordable electric car then you’re not exactly in the market for a Tesla anyway.”

That’s the point of the headline and article.

since Tesla isn’t making the affordable cars they promised to consumers, countries like Mexico are going to make the affordable cars promise to consumers.

dual boot is very simple and stable, I’ve been using Ubuntu / windows 10 for years after following a 10-minute YouTube video and basically only switch over to windows for games.

It’s a great setup overall If there are some windows applications you prefer or are more convenient.

yep, just like that.

“You literally tried to argue against the DDG CEO’s statement about how DuckAssist works lol”

you clearly need help.

The statement you provided says exactly what I said in greater detail, that the duck duck Go llm verifies apparently factual statements with credible third-party sources, you are literally providing further evidence for my comments while proving yourself incorrect.

it is funny watching you proving yourself wrong, though, and you should keep doing it.

I hope you find another source that further supports what I’m saying while completely backfiring against your proud ignorance.

Too many big words for you?

I’m sincerely glad they make you laugh.

“I’m sorry I hurt your feelings”

I feel only pity for you.

reading your comments is like watching a diseased guinea pig nibble on its own scabs.

“an LLM that approves copy pasted wikipedia snippets”

duckduckgo’s llm tool offers relevant information from credible sources.

that is good.

Good luck unbunching those panties.

haha, whaaat why?

I just saw it for the first time today, it seems to mostly quote incredible sources rather than amalgamating responses.

you got some issues huh, poor fella?

have you tried the duck assist thing yet?

If you’re trying to talk to the search engine more like a chat assistant, that sort of response might be what you’re looking for.

bummer.

I see all the labeled sponsored links on Bing, but I generally get high quality results outside of those.

News orgs clinging to tradition.

i use archive.is for anything I really want to read.

most news is fluffy bullshit anyway.

it must have done by now, then, I get different results from identical prompts in DuckDuckGo and Bing although both are usually relevant.

“DuckDuckGo’s results are a compilation of “over 400” sources according to itself, including Bing, Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot); but none from Google.”

are you having trouble finding something specifically or you just don’t like the quality of the search results you’re finding in general?

definitely if you’re still on Google, stop using it.

It’s completely useless at this point.

oh, good tip. I didn’t know about that.

you tack !g to the end of whatever the resulting search URL is?

is it? that kind of makes sense, because I still use Bing occasionally while Google is completely out of rotation, although I don’t find Bing as good as duckduckgo.

edit: it is not! looks like the DuckDuckGo search engine is an aggregate of hundreds of search engines, including their own duck duck bot, excluding Google but including some Bing results.

they’re pretty bad, but ddg at least feels like I’m getting actual results.

“losing its previous 3-year lead.”

what three-year lead?

“The future is uncertain, but the past is already set.”

or you think it is.

this sounds like it’s confirming my original comment with more specificity, that Intel was consistently playing catch up to tsmc and the only thing that might happen in the future is that maybe tsmc doesn’t progress at the rate they have been and Intel develops a theoretical technology.

lots of maybes and ifs.

maybes and ifs are not evidence of TSMCs downfall, they’re playthings that may or may not happen without any reasonable data to interpret.

I don’t have a horse in this race, but I am allegiant to facts and logical consistency.

juggling what ifs is not very interesting for me.

“Intel has only been behind for the last 7 years or so”

what is your source for this?

at what point was intel even at par with tsmc in semiconductor/fab quality and production?

I’ve heard this twice now, but as far as I understand, Intel has never met the fabrication technology or demand that TSMC has and has been playing catch up for three decades.

I’m very willing to read a sourced article offering more historical context.

as for the article you’ve linked, it’s a more technical iteration of the “yea but maybe?” articles.

There’s zero refutation of tsmc dominance and zero evidence of a true emergent competitor.

“but it remains to be seen whether they’ll hit a wall where Samsung and/or Intel leapfrog them again. Or maybe Samsung or Intel hit a wall and fall even further behind. Either way, we’re not yet at a stage where we know what things look like beyond 2nm”

their point is “heyvwe don’t know”, but if tsmc next-gen R&D and production fails, and if another company is able to close the distance between themselves and tsmc’s current held advantage, and if that theoretical company is then able to pull ahead with theoretical technologies, then TSMC might not be in first place in terms of semiconductor manufacturing.

“but what if…” isn’t exactly a compelling or relevatory argument.

if a new zero emissions concrete dropped tomorrow and if a company secured the funding to produce it commercially and if they partnered with a next-gen 3d-printing company and real estate developer exclusively committed to low-income housing, then they could build a national chain of economically viable housing units.

None of that has happened and there’s no evidence of it happening, so it’s just a hypothetical series of events.

you have practical, working tsmc chips plus next-gen r&d versus theoretical chips from Intel, a company that has not fared well over 30 years of trying to catch up with TSMC.

they’re not worried yet.