Anger is overrated, it’s a motivator but it makes you sloppy. You should be focused and resolute towards different people.

I think there’s part of every nerd that loves seeing a real expert casually embarrass some cocky hotshot.

Y’know it’s funny, I just rewatched Her last night since my wife hasn’t seen it. Something that really struck me as somewhat overlooked on release was the undertone of “everyone is socially awkward and emotionally immature”, which has really aged like wine.

First of all, right from the opening scene, Theodore works at a company that writes “beautiful handwritten letters” by proxy. Later we learn there’s a married couple he’s been writing letters between since they first started dating. The whole film starts with the commodification of emotional connection.

Then there’s the phone sex girl, who asks him to choke her with a dead cat. Now, I’m no stranger to the kink community, but springing that on a random stranger mid-scene? That’s not something you just do. That’s a whole conversation with a consenting partner.

And no one takes rejection maturely. When Theodore goes on a date with Olivia Wilde’s character, everything is going great until she tries to get way too serious way too fast, on the first date. When Theodore doesn’t respond, she immediately says he’s “a real creepy dude” and shuts down. Then there’s Isabella.

Theodore is far from being unique in falling for an AI, since there’s already a service to provide surrogate bodies for human-AI relationships. But Isabella never meets him, never establishes boundaries, nothing. Now, I’m in an open relationship, and have brought women into the bedroom with my wife, but doing so without any kind of introduction or prep or anything is insane. But when Theodore doesn’t feel comfortable with the situation, Isabella has a breakdown. She doesn’t respect Theodore’s reluctance, all that matters is that she “wanted to be part of something pure”, without actually consulting the other human party involved.

Then there’s Charles, Amy’s husband, who clearly puts no effort into understanding her work, and decided he didn’t want to be married anymore after an argument about shoes.

And Catherine, who according to Amy had pretty volatile emotions, and seemed to project her own perfectionist insecurities onto Theodore, claiming he wanted her to be perfect when the story implies those were her own hangups.

I struggle to find a single character who seemed to be emotionally mature. They overreact, communicate poorly, and generally seem obsessively focused on themselves.

All of which is to say there’s no wonder they seemed to fall into parasocial relationships with AI. Having interacted with humans in the last 5 years, it seems like that kind of parasocial behavior is the most poignant prediction of the 2013 film. It seems like this “Google weirdness” is an accurate assessment of where we are as a species.

I read that comment completely differently. The “socialism” in “Sorta like socialism” is supposed to replace “free markets” in the previous comment.

“They” only want “socialism” when it’s corporate bailouts. Privatized profits, socialized losses.

I can see the value of data networks. If every car on the road is self driving and interconnected, they know where every other car is and can cooperatively adjust their speed and routes to basically eliminate traffic. Even if it’s just every car in a taxi fleet, they can still share their sensor data to build a better operating map from multiple angles. The privacy side of that is rough, but it could drastically reduce accidents compared to individual human drivers.

And then there’s the rotation applied to Dinah Mo Humm’s sugar plum

Spirals are actually quite common. Electromagnetic waves are spirals, the Earth’s orbit spirals through the galaxy. A spiral is just non-static circular motion. Circular motion is one of the most basic and widespread phenomena in the universe, at every scale. It’s not really mysterious that they would show up a lot.

Or Gurren Lagann

For me, I’ve got a million interests. I could change and learn this one thing, but that would take time away from learning about other, more personally interesting things.

I can think of several use-cases: subtitles for the hearing impaired, translation, AR overlays for technical work, etc. Not saying they’re a good value, but it seems weird to say there’s no use-case.

And I genuinely don’t understand the pervert angle. What do they do for perverts that can’t be done with much cheaper button/pen cameras, or even a phone in your breast pocket?

Like sure, there are problems with surveillance and ads and other nasty tech bro shit, that much is obvious. But I sincerely do not understand why they’re being called pervert glasses. Am I missing something?

NFTs would be the digital assets available for trade. In the test marketplace, it was mostly the standard “unique” pictures, but that was just for testing. The idea was to use NFTs as a proof-of-ownership of a digital asset. Instead of a picture of a monkey or something, they’d be like activation codes or in-game assets (skins, guns, etc) with the goal of creating a secondary market for digital assets. There was also the potential to use them for smart contracts, so that the original creator could get a percentage every time one of their assets was sold on the secondary market.

As for the Trump thumping, the only thing I saw was that tweet that said “TRUMP” a bunch, and considering the timing the consensus seemed to be that he was trying to exploit the algorithm. I haven’t seen him actively endorse Trump, though admittedly I haven’t been following very closely the last couple of years. It would be somewhat out of character for him though, he has been consistently vocal against Wall Street shenanigans, particularly predatory shorting and market manipulation.

Eh, the crypto move was pretty reasonable actually. It’s not like they were pumping meme coins, they were trying to build a marketplace to trade digital assets, which is probably the most legitimate application of blockchain. And in any case it seems like they’ve abandoned the idea for now.

Not sure how you can say he “shit the bed”, the company’s only gotten more profitable under his direction.

Maybe a tax rebate based on tread-wear of the damaged tire? If it still has 50% of the tread, you get a 50% rebate on your tire tax.

Consider yourself lucky.

I used them exactly one time. The driver brought the wrong food, the name and order weren’t even close.

Doordash refused to send a new driver, best they could offer was a credit for not even half the price. Even escalating customer service just got the credit converted to a refund, again for less than half of the charge. The rep could not explain to me what service I had received to justify keeping most of my money.

They are diluting the value of eBay’s shares.

Kinda, but not really. Each share becomes $56 and like 2 new shares. It’s more like a fat dividend than a dilution.

You should look into Cohen’s track record before assuming it’ll go nowhere.

But you won’t think an 11% swing is particularly notable.

The debt is only $20B, even then it still works out to about where it’s trading now, so still not really dilutive. And it’s still under 50% leverage, which is honestly pretty typical for a large company. Assuming Cohen actually has a plan to boost profits, that debt isn’t particularly concerning.

Give it another 84 years, you’ll learn.

Finhle is Einkorn, buy the dip.

It only touched $28 in AH Friday. On the 4th, the high-low spread was not even 10%.