

Dare I ask, what ssh thing?
Side Note: It was already believed that SSH encryption was broken by state actors since the first NSA leaks. So, people should at least always use it over another encrypted channel anyway.
Previous Account: @badmin@lemm.ee
Alternative Account: @badmin@reddthat.com


Dare I ask, what ssh thing?
Side Note: It was already believed that SSH encryption was broken by state actors since the first NSA leaks. So, people should at least always use it over another encrypted channel anyway.


skill issue


People can distrust whomever they wish to. But hallucinating factually inconsistent and logically incoherent theories around that distrust is another matter.
What part does switching from dual-licensed software to GPL-licensed software to MIT-licensed software play in an evil plan? Are there sky angels out there preventing evil doers from adding backdoors to binary packages of AGPL-licensed software in particular?


My innocent self thought these “theories” only get purported by YouTube/X teenagers. I guess I was wrong.
sudo is not GPL software, chrony didn’t even complete a year as a default choice in Ubuntu, and gpsd actually adopts a BSD license. Read the comments @ISO@lemmy.zip wrote in this thread.
It’s kind of funny how you didn’t pick up on the connection between 3 and 4 😉
Is it just me, or is the “among others” in the title made it sound like an outbreak, instead of referring to other projects?