Arch is several months ahead of other distros
Source for that? It’s one of those weird, wild affirmations that go around regarding Arch. Ahead in terms of what? Integrating the most up-to-date kernel or something?
Is it because of the rolling release model? But it’s not the only one to have rolling releases.
Yes, I find this obsession with Arch on Lemmy very weird. It’s certainly not a distro for beginners. Ubuntu (let the hate flow), Mint, Fedora, and many others would be better choices.
If it is what you like, fair enough but I feel that it is encouraged around here as a default for both beginners and advanced users, which is bizarre. It’s too complex for beginners and not optimisable enough for very advanced users. I don’t hate it but I hate to see it become the standard.
Sorry I can’t help with additional info, as you said there’s little to find. It’s referenced on DW at least, but not much more is given there
A bloody discord FFS, I’m not going there.
But then I guess it’s not open source, if we can’t find the source.
I don’t see myself installing a distro for which you can’t even find the license? How do you even know you have the right to install or use it?