

or the US fash think they’ll secretly amass a collection of vulnerabilities and exploits if they’re the only ones who they allow to use it
Furry (feral dhole), he/him, feet/(hind)paw worshipper, car appreciator, mechanical watch wearer, cloud engineer, thinkpad/pop!os!!/i3wm user, occasional synth/guitar/handpan player, car/track enthusiast
Avatar and banner artist: Heatherwolf
Migrated from https://yiffit.net/u/noxy


or the US fash think they’ll secretly amass a collection of vulnerabilities and exploits if they’re the only ones who they allow to use it


I demand a physical power button for my EV, and a physical key fob. I am not okay with how Rivian only gives new owners a single key fob, the second key being relegated to an RFID card and an expectation that any other driver must use a smartphone app to replace physical key fob functions.
Taycan fits my needs very well in those regards, thankfully.


“We started noticing consumers weren’t rewarding polish the way brands thought they were,” said Chookie founder Zev Ziegler in a press release. “They were rewarding effort. Humor. Tiny human decisions. When we compared the performance of our handmade work against AI-generated creative, the difference wasn’t subtle.”


I made my recommendation. Is on you after that.


it blows up in the makers face, it reacts uncleanly and leaves more nuclear waste than if it more completely went off, uhhh a bunch more ways it could fuck up


imagine someone actually assembling a nuclear or biological weapon based off LLM responses, like they can’t even get a simple fucking web search right most of the time, and you wanna put together deadly materials based on that shit??


SUPPOSE HES GOT A BUNCH


Monty Python debunked this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuVudN_BDjQ


I agree on nearly all points (I drive a Taycan and I’m glad to have modern safety engineering in my daily driver, and I don’t use the data service at all).
What does ANY of that have to do with the specific drivetrain of electric vehicles?
Your stance is against all new cars. Nothing to do with EVs specifically. And in that regard I do agree with you, that surveillance is unacceptable especially when it’s put into our personal property.
Just weird thing to say in an EV specific context.


EVs are no more surveillance devices than internal combustion engine cars are. I’m getting so tired of this moronic take.


NO that makes you dumber in a GOOD WAY THO.


not gonna self host bullshit that wastes resources and makes me dumber.


A high power something yeah


just make the light source more concave than his head is convex!
maybe. or just use a [REDACTED]


The 350kw chargers we’ve had for years are good enough. They just need to be reliable and there need to be more of them.


this town
Troy, New York
I love seeing this masterpiece of an article shared around. Really incredible stuff!