• febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If artificial intelligence can be trained on stolen information, then so should be “natural” intelligence.

    Oh, wait. One is owned by oligarchs raking in billions, the other just serves the plebs.

  • Enelop@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    He means development of AI in public view is over. Governments will continue without regard for copyright protections until we are all dead.

  • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    My main takeaway is that some contrived notion of “national security” has now become an acceptable justification for business decisions in the US.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Come on guys, his company is only worth $157 billion.

    Of course he can’t pay for content he needs for his automated bullshit machine. He’s not made of money!

  • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I hope generative AI obliterates copyright. I hope that its destruction is so thorough that we either forget it ever existed or we talk about it in disgust as something that only existed in stupider times.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Thing is that copywrite did serve a purpose and was for like 20 years before disney got it extended to the nth degree. The idea was the authors had a chance to make money but were expected to be prolific enough to have more writings by the time 20 years was over. I would like to see with patents that once you get one you have a limited time to go to market. Maybe 10 years and if you product is ever not available for purchase (at a cost equivalent to the average cost accounted for inflation or something) you lose the patent so others can produce it. So like stop making an attachment for a product and now anyone can.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      I find that very unlikely to happen. If AI is accepted as fair use by the legal system, then that means they have a motive to keep copyright as restrictive as possible; it protects their work but allows them to use every one else’s. If you hate copyright (and you should) AI is probably your enemy, not your ally.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Interesting take. I’m not opposed, but I feel like the necessary reverse engineering skill base won’t ramp up enough to deal with SAS and holomorphic encryption. So, in a world without copyright, you might be able to analog hole whatever non-interactibe media you want, but software piracy will be rendered impossible at the end of the escalation of hostilities.

      Copyright is an unnatural, authoritarian-imposed monopoly. I doubt it will last forever.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Copyright is a good idea. It was just stretched beyond all reasonable expectations. Copyright should work like Patents. 15 years. You get one, and only one, 15 year extension. At either the 15 or 30 year mark, the work enters the public domain.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I need a seamstress AI to take over 10 million seamstress robots so I don’t have to pay 100million seamstresses for fruit of the loom underwear… Could you tech it how to do double well and then back up at each end with some zigzags? For free? I mean everyone knows zigzag!

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Sounds like another way of saying “there actually isn’t a profitable business in this.”

    But since we live in crazy world, once he gets his exemption to copyright laws for AI, someone needs to come up with a good self hosted AI toolset that makes it legal for the average person to pirate stuff at scale as well.