Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ will start cracking down on password sharing | CNN Business::Disney is banning password sharing on its streaming services, following in the footsteps of competitor Netflix.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    You pay for x number of simultaneous streams it shouldn’t fucking matter who the hell are using it, it’s still x number of simultaneous streams.

    But hey streaming was good while it lasted and a VPN is cheaper after all.

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I really don’t want to. I work in the film industry. I feel like 🏴‍☠️is like cutting the branch you’re on for me but I can’t afford to keep all those subscriptions, especially when the studios are fuxking us with sand on salaries and making the trikes last all year long. So far, I started soft with movie-web.app for some shows. If they keep on pushing us I will break. It’s not stealing if the other solution is racket.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Piracy is and always has been a service issue. When a high quality, convenient, affordable service is provided on a consistent basis without endless bullshit, I have no problem paying.

        When it constantly feels like I’m being bled dry for every single cent I have just to watch some TV…. Well, arrrrgh

        I buy the blu ray versions of stuff I want to support

      • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t like doing it, and I would be thrilled to throw my money at a single service that allows me to stream anything I want at high bitrate 4K. I’d actually be willing to pay a pretty high premium for that. Money is not the issue, it’s the quality of service. I genuinely wish there was a way to pay for a service that benefitted the film industry while providing a quality service to me. Until that’s the case, I’ll continue sailing on a ship that gives me the highest-possible quality content.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hell yeah. I’d pay $300 a month if they provide everything over 6 months old and never take shit out of the catalog.

          I’d be super happy not to have to maintain my own catalogs.

          • sploosh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yo man let’s not go crazy, $300 a year would be on the high end of acceptable for that. The costs to keep more data available when you own the licenses are quite low as a percentage of total operations, so keeping old content up should be the norm instead of something to be lauded. You don’t get a cookie for base competency.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I subscribed to a pack for “most streaming services in my country” because I earn enough money now and wanted to try being honest. But I will very probably not renew it, I pay 50€/month, but still use Plex almost as often :

      1. The web apps suck, the mobile ones are often worse (laggy, contrast changes while watching, lack of features …)
      2. Some shows are not available in a decent quality : in France we have Kaamelott, owned by Canal+, they probably made an intern upload the episodes so it’s only available at 360p
      3. They try to control what you watch : the “continue watching” section of Netflix has been randomly placed between line 1 and 4 for a while now, seemingly just to push their bulshit recommendation algorithms that will me watch yet another cheap copycat
      4. Some “premium” movies are not part of any subscription (eg. Puss In Boots 2)
      5. Some show may not be available anywhere when shady exclusivity contracts expire (eg. “Au service de la France” was only available through piracy last time a friend tried to watch it) …

      Sooooo … I was ok with the services sucking but I can’t be okay with them so obviously not trying to improve.

      It’s also incredible how I was pirating everything else when I was a teenager (video games, books, audio, …) and managed to stop almost immediately when I received my first salary.

  • TommySalami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Interestingly enough, 2/3 of those are subs I dropped within the last year or so based on a lack of quality/content for what they cost (never bothered with ESPN, NHL games are easy to find). Seems like streaming is starting to collapse a lot quicker than TV did.

    • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Likewise, just cancelled Disney+ and Hulu last month, along with Paramount+, and Netflix.

      Only still have AppleTV+ because it’s still cheap. And then Max because it’s included in our cell service, and Amazon for the shipping, but I don’t really use either, and am looking into the feasibility of dropping Prime, if I can convince the wife.

      • Vub@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        AppleTV+ is still cheap where you live? Here in Europe it went from 4,99€ to 6,99€ and I think they just raised it to 9,99€. They have some great shows but VERY little content all in all. And at a doubled price which now matches all the other services (all around 10€ each) it is just not worth it IMO.

        I might get it for one binge-month in the future just to watch Severance season two though. Or… just get it elsewhere…

        • Danitos@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hey, my SO and I really loved Severance and watch it in my Jellyfin server, which I set up so they can connect from anywhere. I’ll add season 2 the moment it launches. I would be happy to give you acess to it if you want to, just let me know.

          • Vub@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            That is so nice of you, thank you for the offer! I’ll try to keep it in mind once its out. 😊 And yes indeed it’s a brilliant show.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Rumors are out that they’re gonna try to enshitify Plex too.

      Not saying run away, but maybe keep Jellyfin handy.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I store my media library on a truenas server, all I have to do is boot up a jellyfish VM and point it to the same filepath.

        I will be experimenting with it to see which I prefer and so I have a backup if plex goes to shit

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Same but unraid.

          Plex is better at figuring out naming issues.

          JF lacks a global lookup so you have to sort your own DNS.

          But then again, JF doesn’t sell your watching habits

          I have em in parallel ATM.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Really as long as plex doesn’t try to crack down on locally hosted media, I’m not worried.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I think that would pretty much end them.

              I think we’re in for pre-roll ads. More invasive pushes to get us to purchase content from partners. Theyre already selling what and where we’re watching. My guess is the different streaming services will be really interested in where our eyes are if we’re not their customer.

              My biggest worry is plex seeing when we’re watching stuff before it’s available. Let’s say the streaming companies continue to decline and piracy continues to increase, If the MPAA decides to renew its fight against piracy they might very well have a database of what and when we’re watching everything.

              Right now there’s not really anything they could do about it at least in the US. But right now isn’t 5 years from now on this data is going to live on.

              It’s not that hard to picture a change of events where you’re watching a Netflix exclusive show and they line up that you don’t have a Netflix subscription. Putting numbers to intellectual property sale losses without paying is a pretty good way to get laws made.