Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to Technology@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWikipedia is resilient because it is boringwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square101linkfedilinkarrow-up1860arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1848arrow-down1external-linkWikipedia is resilient because it is boringwww.theverge.comAatube@kbin.melroy.org to Technology@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square101linkfedilinkfile-text
The world’s largest encyclopedia became the factual foundation of the web, but now it’s under attack.
minus-squarezqps@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI don’t quite follow. You’re saying she is financed by Russia?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agothere was a senate investigation. it found she was not, in fact, financed by russia.
minus-squareMDCCCLV@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSenate investigation is sadly partisan and doesn’t mean much anymore. They’ll find what they wanted to find.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agothey found she didn’t take money from Russia. it wasn’t partisan. it was just a fact.
minus-squareMDCCCLV@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo one that is an American politician will be directly financed by Russia. It would always be indirect or hidden shell companies.
I don’t quite follow. You’re saying she is financed by Russia?
there was a senate investigation. it found she was not, in fact, financed by russia.
Senate investigation is sadly partisan and doesn’t mean much anymore. They’ll find what they wanted to find.
they found she didn’t take money from Russia. it wasn’t partisan. it was just a fact.
No one that is an American politician will be directly financed by Russia. It would always be indirect or hidden shell companies.
Very much yes