staircase@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agoMeta found liable in child exploitation casewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square161linkfedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down113file-text
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1external-linkMeta found liable in child exploitation casewww.theguardian.comstaircase@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square161linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBarneyPiccolo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoSo the fine was basically paid by Lunchtime on January 1.
minus-squareBoiglenoight@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoYes. It’s probably concerning if they are continuously fined, but unless there’s a mechanism that ensures that, this is likely just annoying and not meaningful.
minus-squareBarneyPiccolo@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoJust an itch to be scratched. Done. What’s for lunch?
So the fine was basically paid by Lunchtime on January 1.
Yes. It’s probably concerning if they are continuously fined, but unless there’s a mechanism that ensures that, this is likely just annoying and not meaningful.
Just an itch to be scratched. Done. What’s for lunch?