• aurelar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s a difference between using a tool as a knowledgeable professional, and using a tool as a novice or a member of the general public: the professional can likely tell when the answer an AI gives is wrong.

    AI is a tool that can be useful sometimes.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Ayup, i’ve literally thrown massive logs into an llm and “find the errors” to track down a complex issue. They’re very good paper sorters

    • Haley@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I suppose Microslop aren’t actually professionals anymore.

      I can live with that

      • aurelar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I can stand AI as long as the code is reviewed line-by-line by a human. The only problem I have aside from that is that I wonder if code generated by an AI can validly be placed under an open source licence instead of being public domain. Didn’t a court rule that you couldn’t copyright generated code?

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        And the bitterness?

        I don’t support what the big corpos are doing, but you’re straight up denying that a hammer is a tool.

        • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          no i mean people coping that now their hero linus used AI they aren’t calling for him to be shunned from the linux community.