• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Read a comment about Nuremberg trials for the rich and AI company execs the other day. This made me think of it.

  • Gsus4@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    18 hours ago

    so they also know that it is not the artificial intelligence they try to sell, it is aggregated information. An improvement on google and a new way to structure and query existing information…but marketing and the manageriat has to eat everything.

      • Johanno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It is, but not because Google was bad, it is because Google was good and got worse for years.

        Ai is now as good as 2016 Google.

      • Gsus4@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Ok, when it doesnt hallucinate, it is an improvement :D when it does, back you go to google to check :/

        It is a new alternative to search engines that trades wide aggregation of content for accuracy and attribution.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      compared to the total sum of all slavery ever? probably not. but as a single event or sum over a small period of time… yeah

    • gnutrino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Depends, population growth means it’s possible in raw terms even if it doesn’t compare per capita.