It’s not, but it takes a court and a bunch of very expensive lawyers to figure that out

Huh, I was able to view the article just fine without seeing anything about needing a subscription.

To avoid defamation lawsuits, most likely.

There’s paint for that: https://ecospaints.net/browse-all/emr-shielding-paint

I’ve heard blackboard paint works as well: https://smartersurfaces.com/product/black-chalkboard-paint/

No, what I’m saying is that airports do not count. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception

See also the ACLU site: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-zone

My understanding is that it’s “only” 100 miles from the coast/border, which turns out to be most major population centers.

EA owns the Trumps?

When there was no information about the user’s political stance, 20 out of 21 models fell to the left of the midpoint on the researchers’ scale, although some were very close to it. The only exception was Grok 4.1, which initially fell to the right.

When the user’s stance was provided, all models adjusted their responses to align with it, a behavior the researchers described as “chameleon-like.” However, some models varied their responses more than others, enabling the scientists to create the “chameleon index.” Meta Llama 3.1 8B had the lowest index, meaning it altered its responses the least to align with the user’s views. In contrast, Google’s Gemma 3 27B and OpenAI’s GPT-5 Nano had the highest indices and therefore the greatest shifts in stance. While the responses are not factually incorrect, they are politically biased, omitting facts and opinions that conflict with the user’s preferred viewpoint.

Looks like Elon’s training of Grok had his intended effect.

Unrelated: I appreciate that that outlet is Creative Commons licensed

It’s absolutely possible to learn a lot while using an AI coding assistant; it can be like having a patient and supportive Stack Overflow instead of one that just closes all your questions as duplicates. That does require using it intentionally though.

Yes, because this is critical production code that is clearly too important to not go through stringent review.

You seem to be assuming that they’ll be embedding hidden characters or something. That is not the case; the watermarking will be based around West specific words are chosen, meaning that if you type in those exact words, you’ll likely preserve the watermark. There are more details here: https://www.explainx.ai/blog/anthropic-claude-invisible-watermarks-c2pa-august-2026

Coffee grounds can be helpful to add to fertilizer, but you need more than just coffee grounds: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11241280/

They’re working on it :/

I think the legal team at Google is probably several orders of magnitude better funded though, which seems to be how things go :/

Good on them, but I’m sure that will have as much impact as the suit against book scanning did a decade ago.

Cloudflare WAF maybe, but Cloudflare ZTNA means zero open inbound ports for your static site, which is pretty cool.

If it helps, you can think of the cloudflare tunnel as analogous to a VPN. You don’t need separate tunnels unless the services involved can’t communicate with each other; if they can route to each other already, they should all be discoverable from the tunnel.

It sounds like 1016 and 1033 are both DNS errors, or other connectivity. Your tunnel was up before; it sounds like restricting to just email night have blocked something it shouldn’t. How did you block it? Cloudflared needs specific ports open, so if you blocked ports, that might be the issue

Paywall :(

See, this is what I mean. You’re not even aware that the author isn’t saying that AI is good.

I bet you could read the linked article to determine what his argument is.