• pogmommy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 days ago

    Impressive that theyre finally adding a feature that ive already been using. Makes you wonder how they do that

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Feels super strange to read this. They had profiles for what, decades now? It just required a simple command line flag.

    I mean, this is better, but… Yeah.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This features great if you habe two people who use a device. I have it on the steamdeck in my lounge and its nice for people to be able to open Firefox and have all their accounts saved and their extensions

  • theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I find multi account containers to be the best workflow ergonomics when it comes to separating logins and sessions. I think having the same bookmarks, theme, etc. is actually nice. But I’m sure many really enjoy profile swapping.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      profiles also allow different addons and addon configurations, default fonts, browser config, etc… it’s kinda like having a whole other user account or a whole other copy of the browser, rather than just cookie and storage isolation

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          totally; and i think that’s very fair for the large majority of use-cases… most people don’t need different browser settings: they just need different local storage

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh good, the current profile management is a little bit clunky. Having the option to launch random profiles wherever and whenever would be nice.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    uhhh, this has been a thing for a long time already. I don’t know whats new here. put about:profiles in your url bar for anyone uses a firefox based browser.

  • N3Cr0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    about:profiles always worked for me. And the profile manager. I don’t need a 3rd ui for switching profiles.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 days ago

      The new one is a much better experience. It works like profiles in chrome now. The old one is still there for you to use if you prefer.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        It works like profiles in chrome now.

        Is it gonna pop up obnoxiously every time you start the program?

        Is it gonna demand that I create a new profile every time I sign in to Google?

        • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Is it gonna pop up obnoxiously every time you start the program?

          Your choice, there’s a checkbox to ask every time or not

          Is it gonna demand that I create a new profile every time I sign in to Google?

          I don’t recall anything like that, though I don’t recall that in Chrome either.

  • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think containers (that Firefox already has) are a much better way to handle this. Profiles, art least the way they are implemented on chrome, feels like a massive downgrade.

    • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      It depends on how much separation you need. If you want different bookmarks, history, or settings per, then I believe you need profiles to make that happen.

      • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ah, makes sense. I don’t mind sharing history and have never used bookmarks or customized any settings.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      You can use containers all you want, just don’t create another profile and you’re golden.

      • daq@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is what I do now, just trying to figure out why ff keeps spending time on profiles. Do they have any advantages over containers?

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Different set of cookies, different set of preferences, bookmarks, history, etc. If you need to completely separate two instances, for example one for work and one for everything else, you can only do it with profiles

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          containers are for general browsing; profiles are for the whole browser

          profiles allow you to have different addons installed, different configurations between addons in different profiles, different browser settings (eg a SOCKS proxy for work profile, or a different default search engine, default fonts, etc… or for technical users you can have a profile with experimental settings turned on)

        • SuperUserDO@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          For highly technical users containers are going to do everything we need.

          For non technical users who need separation, profiles are a standard known framework.

          • fitgse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            My non technical spouse prefers profile to separate work and personal. She uses different themes for each profile so it is very obvious which is which.

            Also one of the extensions she likes interferes with a work site she is required to use. She has that extension installed in the personal profile but not work profile.